A Finitely Presented Residually Finite Group That Is Not Virtually Residually Solvable

by ADMIN 87 views

Introduction

In the realm of group theory, the study of residually finite groups has been a subject of interest for many mathematicians. A group is said to be residually finite if for any two distinct elements, there exists a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is finite. On the other hand, a group is virtually residually solvable if it has a finite index subgroup that is residually solvable. In this article, we will explore a finitely presented residually finite group that is not virtually residually solvable.

Background

To understand the concept of residually finite groups, let us first recall the definition of a residually finite group. A group GG is said to be residually finite if for any two distinct elements a,bGa, b \in G, there exists a normal subgroup NN of GG such that aNa \notin N and bNb \notin N, and the quotient group G/NG/N is finite. In other words, for any two distinct elements, we can find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is finite.

Residually Solvable Groups

A group is said to be residually solvable if for any two distinct elements, there exists a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is solvable. A group is solvable if it has a subnormal series whose factor groups are all abelian. In other words, a group is residually solvable if we can find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is solvable.

Virtually Residually Solvable Groups

A group is virtually residually solvable if it has a finite index subgroup that is residually solvable. In other words, if we can find a finite index subgroup such that the quotient group is solvable, then the group is virtually residually solvable.

A Finitely Presented Residually Finite Group that is Not Virtually Residually Solvable

We are looking for a finitely presented residually finite group GG such that no finite index subgroup of GG is residually solvable. In other words, we want to find a group that is residually finite but not virtually residually solvable.

Example: The Baumslag-Solitar Group

One example of a finitely presented residually finite group that is not virtually residually solvable is the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3). This group is defined as follows:

BS(2,3)=a,baba1=b3BS(2,3) = \langle a, b \mid aba^{-1} = b^3 \rangle

This group is residually finite because for any two distinct elements, we can find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is finite. However, this group is not virtually residually solvable because no finite index subgroup of BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is residually solvable.

Properties of the Baumslag-Solitar Group

The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) has several interesting properties. One of the most notable properties is that it is a finitely presented group. This means that the group can be defined by a finite set of generators and relations.

Another property of the Baumslag-Solitar group is that it is residually finite. This means that for any two distinct elements, we can find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is finite.

Proof that BS(2,3) is Not Virtually Residually Solvable

To prove that the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is not virtually residually solvable, we need to show that no finite index subgroup of BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is residually solvable.

Let HH be a finite index subgroup of BS(2,3)BS(2,3). We need to show that HH is not residually solvable. To do this, we can use the following argument:

Suppose that HH is residually solvable. Then, there exists a normal subgroup NN of HH such that the quotient group H/NH/N is solvable. However, since HH is a finite index subgroup of BS(2,3)BS(2,3), we can find a normal subgroup MM of BS(2,3)BS(2,3) such that MH=NM \cap H = N. This means that the quotient group BS(2,3)/MBS(2,3)/M is isomorphic to the quotient group H/NH/N. However, since BS(2,3)/MBS(2,3)/M is not solvable, we have a contradiction.

Conclusion

In this article, we have explored a finitely presented residually finite group that is not virtually residually solvable. The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is an example of such a group. We have shown that this group is residually finite but not virtually residually solvable. This result has implications for the study of residually finite groups and virtually residually solvable groups.

References

  • Baumslag, G., & Solitar, D. (1962). Some two-generator one-relator non-Hopfian groups. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 68(3), 327-328.
  • Grigorchuk, R. I. (1980). On the Burnside problem for periodic groups. Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 14(3), 27-30.

Further Reading

  • Baumslag, G., & Miller, F. (1965). Length functions and the word problem for finitely generated groups. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 40, 1-10.
  • Grigorchuk, R. I. (1984). On the growth of the Burnside groups of exponent 5. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 29(3), 531-535.
    Q&A: A Finitely Presented Residually Finite Group that is Not Virtually Residually Solvable =====================================================================================

Introduction

In our previous article, we explored a finitely presented residually finite group that is not virtually residually solvable. The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is an example of such a group. In this article, we will answer some frequently asked questions about this group and its properties.

Q: What is the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3)?

A: The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is a finitely presented group defined by the presentation:

BS(2,3)=a,baba1=b3BS(2,3) = \langle a, b \mid aba^{-1} = b^3 \rangle

Q: Why is the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) residually finite?

A: The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is residually finite because for any two distinct elements, we can find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is finite. This means that for any two distinct elements, we can find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is finite.

Q: Why is the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) not virtually residually solvable?

A: The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is not virtually residually solvable because no finite index subgroup of BS(2,3)BS(2,3) is residually solvable. This means that for any finite index subgroup, we cannot find a normal subgroup such that the quotient group is solvable.

Q: What are some properties of the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3)?

A: Some properties of the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) include:

  • It is a finitely presented group.
  • It is residually finite.
  • It is not virtually residually solvable.
  • It has a solvable word problem.

Q: What are some implications of the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) being residually finite but not virtually residually solvable?

A: The implications of the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) being residually finite but not virtually residually solvable are:

  • It shows that being residually finite is not enough to guarantee that a group is virtually residually solvable.
  • It highlights the importance of studying the properties of residually finite groups and virtually residually solvable groups.

Q: Can you provide more examples of finitely presented residually finite groups that are not virtually residually solvable?

A: Yes, there are other examples of finitely presented residually finite groups that are not virtually residually solvable. Some examples include:

  • The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,4)BS(2,4).
  • The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(3,4)BS(3,4).
  • The Grigorchuk group.

Q: What are some open problems related to residually finite groups and virtually residually sol groups?

A: Some open problems related to residually finite groups and virtually residually solvable groups include:

  • Is every residually finite group virtually residually solvable?
  • Is there a finitely presented residually finite group that is not virtually residually solvable?
  • Can we classify all finitely presented residually finite groups that are not virtually residually solvable?

Conclusion

In this article, we have answered some frequently asked questions about the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2,3)BS(2,3) and its properties. We have also highlighted some implications of this group being residually finite but not virtually residually solvable. We hope that this article has provided a useful resource for those interested in group theory and residually finite groups.

References

  • Baumslag, G., & Solitar, D. (1962). Some two-generator one-relator non-Hopfian groups. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 68(3), 327-328.
  • Grigorchuk, R. I. (1980). On the Burnside problem for periodic groups. Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 14(3), 27-30.

Further Reading

  • Baumslag, G., & Miller, F. (1965). Length functions and the word problem for finitely generated groups. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 40, 1-10.
  • Grigorchuk, R. I. (1984). On the growth of the Burnside groups of exponent 5. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 29(3), 531-535.