An Upper Bound Problem With Unique Subset Sum

=====================================================

Introduction

---

In the realm of combinatorial optimization, the subset sum problem is a classic example of a problem that has been extensively studied. The problem involves finding a subset of a given set of numbers that sums up to a target value. However, in this article, we will be dealing with a unique variant of the subset sum problem, where we are given a set of pairs of numbers, and we need to find a subset of these pairs that sums up to a target value. We will also explore the concept of an upper bound problem and its relation to the unique subset sum problem.

Background

---

The subset sum problem is a well-known problem in computer science and mathematics. It involves finding a subset of a given set of numbers that sums up to a target value. The problem is NP-complete, which means that the running time of the algorithm increases exponentially with the size of the input. However, in this article, we will be dealing with a unique variant of the subset sum problem, where we are given a set of pairs of numbers, and we need to find a subset of these pairs that sums up to a target value.

Definition of the Unique Subset Sum Problem

The unique subset sum problem can be defined as follows:

• Given a set of pairs of numbers, $\{(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), (x_3, y_3), \dots, (x_k, y_k)\}$.
• Find a subset of these pairs that sums up to a target value, $T$.
• The value of a set of pairs is defined as the pair $\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i, \sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} y_i\right)$.

Definition of the Upper Bound Problem

The upper bound problem can be defined as follows:

• Given a set of pairs of numbers, $\{(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), (x_3, y_3), \dots, (x_k, y_k)\}$.
• Find the maximum value of a subset of these pairs that sums up to a target value, $T$.
• The value of a set of pairs is defined as the pair $\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i, \sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} y_i\right)$.

Relation between the Unique Subset Sum Problem and the Upper Bound Problem

---

The unique subset sum problem and the upper bound problem are closely related. In fact, the upper bound problem is a generalization of the unique subset sum problem. The unique subset sum problem can be viewed as a special case of the upper bound problem, where the target value, $T$, is equal to the sum of the values of the pairs in the subset.

Theorem 1

The unique subset sum problem can be reduced to the upper bound problem in polynomial time.

Proof

The reduction can be done as follows:

• Given a set of pairs of numbers, $\{(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), (x_3, y_3), \dots, (x_k, y_k)\}$.
• Create a new set of pairs, $\{(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), (x_3, y_3), \dots, (x_k, y_k), (0, 0)\}$.
• The target value, $T$, is equal to the sum of the values of the pairs in the subset, plus the value of the pair $(0, 0)$.
• The value of a set of pairs is defined as the pair $\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i, \sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} y_i\right)$.

Upper Bound for the Unique Subset Sum Problem

---

The upper bound problem can be solved using dynamic programming. The idea is to create a table, $dp$, where $dp[i][j]$ represents the maximum value of a subset of the first $i$ pairs that sums up to $j$.

Algorithm

The algorithm can be described as follows:

• Initialize the table, $dp$, with zeros.
• For each pair, $(x_i, y_i)$, do the following:
• For each value, $j$, from $0$ to $T$, do the following:
• If $j < x_i$, then $dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j]$.
• Otherwise, $dp[i][j] = \max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i-1][j-x_i] + y_i)$.
• Return the maximum value of the table, $dp[T][T]$.

Example

---

Suppose we have a set of pairs of numbers, $\{(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)\}$. We want to find a subset of these pairs that sums up to $10$. The value of a set of pairs is defined as the pair $\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i, \sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} y_i\right)$.

Using the algorithm described above, we can create the table, $dp$, as follows:

$i$	$j$	$dp[i][j]$
0	0	0
0	1	0
0	2	0
0	3	0
0	4	0
0	5	0
0	6	0
0	7	0
0	8	0
0	9	0
0	10	0
1	0	0
1	1	0
1	2	0
1	3	0
1	4	0
1	5	0
1	6	0
1	7	0
1	8	0
1	9	0
1	10	0
2	0	0
2	1	0
2	2	0
2	3	0
2	4	0
2	5	0
2	6	0
2	7	0
2	8	0
2	9	0
2	10	0
3	0	0
3	1	0
3	2	0
3	3	0
3	4	0
3	5	0
3	6	0
3	7	0
3	8	0
3	9	0
3	10	0

After filling in the table, $dp$, we get the following:

$i$	$j$	$dp[i][j]$
0	0	0
0	1	0
0	2	0
0	3	0
0	4	0
0	5	0
0	6	0
0	7	0
0	8	0
0	9	0
0	10	0
1	0	0
1	1	0
1	2	0
1	3	0
1	4	0
1	5	0
1	6	0
1	7	0
1	8

=====================================================

Introduction

---

In our previous article, we discussed the unique subset sum problem and its relation to the upper bound problem. In this article, we will answer some frequently asked questions about the unique subset sum problem and the upper bound problem.

Q1: What is the unique subset sum problem?

---

The unique subset sum problem is a variant of the subset sum problem, where we are given a set of pairs of numbers, and we need to find a subset of these pairs that sums up to a target value.

Q2: How is the unique subset sum problem related to the upper bound problem?

---

The unique subset sum problem is a special case of the upper bound problem. The upper bound problem is a generalization of the unique subset sum problem, where we need to find the maximum value of a subset of pairs that sums up to a target value.

Q3: How can we solve the unique subset sum problem?

---

We can solve the unique subset sum problem using dynamic programming. The idea is to create a table, $dp$, where $dp[i][j]$ represents the maximum value of a subset of the first $i$ pairs that sums up to $j$.

Q4: What is the time complexity of the dynamic programming algorithm for the unique subset sum problem?

---

The time complexity of the dynamic programming algorithm for the unique subset sum problem is $O(nT)$, where $n$ is the number of pairs and $T$ is the target value.

Q5: Can we solve the upper bound problem using dynamic programming?

---

Yes, we can solve the upper bound problem using dynamic programming. The idea is to create a table, $dp$, where $dp[i][j]$ represents the maximum value of a subset of the first $i$ pairs that sums up to $j$.

Q6: What is the time complexity of the dynamic programming algorithm for the upper bound problem?

---

The time complexity of the dynamic programming algorithm for the upper bound problem is $O(nT)$, where $n$ is the number of pairs and $T$ is the target value.

Q7: Can we use a greedy algorithm to solve the unique subset sum problem?

---

No, we cannot use a greedy algorithm to solve the unique subset sum problem. The greedy algorithm does not work for this problem because it does not consider all possible subsets of pairs.

Q8: Can we use a greedy algorithm to solve the upper bound problem?

---

No, we cannot use a greedy algorithm to solve the upper bound problem. The greedy algorithm does not work for this problem because it does not consider all possible subsets of pairs.

Q9: What is the difference between the unique subset sum problem and the subset sum problem?

---

The unique subset sum problem is a variant of the subset sum problem, where we are given a set of pairs of numbers, and we need to find a subset of these pairs that sums up to a target value. The subset sum problem is a more general problem, where we are given a set of numbers, and we need to find a subset of these numbers that sums up to a target.

Q10: Can we use the same algorithm to solve both the unique subset sum problem and the subset sum problem?

---

No, we cannot use the same algorithm to solve both the unique subset sum problem and the subset sum problem. The algorithm for the unique subset sum problem is different from the algorithm for the subset sum problem.

Conclusion

---

In this article, we answered some frequently asked questions about the unique subset sum problem and the upper bound problem. We discussed the relation between the unique subset sum problem and the upper bound problem, and we provided an algorithm for solving the unique subset sum problem using dynamic programming. We also discussed the time complexity of the algorithm and the differences between the unique subset sum problem and the subset sum problem.

References

---

• [1] Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., & Stein, C. (2009). Introduction to algorithms (3rd ed.). MIT Press.
• [2] Korte, B., & Vygen, J. (2008). Combinatorial optimization: Theory and algorithms. Springer.
• [3] Papadimitriou, C. H. (1994). Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley.

Future Work

---

In the future, we plan to explore other variants of the subset sum problem and to develop new algorithms for solving these problems. We also plan to study the applications of the subset sum problem in real-world scenarios.

Acknowledgments

---

We would like to thank our colleagues and friends for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

Appendices

---

A. Proof of Theorem 1

The proof of Theorem 1 is as follows:

• Let $S$ be the set of pairs $\{(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), (x_3, y_3), \dots, (x_k, y_k)\}$.
• Let $T$ be the target value.
• Let $dp[i][j]$ be the maximum value of a subset of the first $i$ pairs that sums up to $j$.
• We can prove by induction that $dp[i][j] = \max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i-1][j-x_i] + y_i)$.

B. Example of the Dynamic Programming Algorithm

The example of the dynamic programming algorithm for the unique subset sum problem is as follows:

• Let $S$ be the set of pairs $\{(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)\}$.
• Let $T$ be the target value $10$.
• We can create the table $dp$ as follows:

$i$	$j$	$dp[i][j]$
0	0	0
0	1	0
0	2	0
0	3	0
0	4	0
0	5	0
0	6	0
0	7	0
0	8	0
0	9	0
0	10	0
1	0	0
1	1	0
1	2	0
1	3	0
1	4	0
1	5	0
1	6	0
1	7	0
1	8	0
1	9	0
1	10	0
2	0	0
2	1	0
2	2	0
2	3	0
2	4	0
2	5	0
2	6	0
2	7	0
2	8	0
2	9	0
2	10	0
3	0	0
3	1	0
3	2	0
3	3	0
3	4	0
3	5	0
3	6	0
3	7	0
3	8	0
3	9	0
3	10	0

After filling in the table $dp$, we get the following:

$i$	$j$	$dp[i][j]$
0	0	0
0	1	0
0	2	0
0	3	0
0	4	0
0	5	0
0	6	0
0	7	0
0	8	0
0	9	0
0	10	0
1	0	0
1	1