How Can I Design A Lab Assignment That Effectively Demonstrates The Trade-offs Between Using Std::array And Std::vector To Implement A Dynamic Stack Data Structure, While Also Ensuring That Students Understand The Implications Of Size Limits And Iterator Invalidation In C++11?
To design a lab assignment that effectively demonstrates the trade-offs between using std::array
and std::vector
for implementing a dynamic stack in C++, while ensuring students understand size limits and iterator invalidation, follow this structured approach:
Lab Assignment: Implementing a Dynamic Stack with std::array
and std::vector
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the differences between
std::array
andstd::vector
in terms of memory management and performance. - Learn how to implement a dynamic stack using both containers.
- Appreciate the implications of size limits and iterator invalidation.
Assignment Structure:
Part 1: Implementing a Stack with std::array
- Objective: Understand fixed-size container limitations.
- Implementation:
- Create a
StackArray
class usingstd::array
. - Include constructor for setting max size, and methods:
push()
,pop()
,top()
,size()
,empty()
. - Handle overflow by throwing an exception when
push()
exceeds capacity.
- Create a
- Discussion Points:
- Fixed size constraints.
- No iterator invalidation due to fixed size.
Part 2: Implementing a Stack with std::vector
- Objective: Explore dynamic resizing and performance implications.
- Implementation:
- Develop a
StackVector
class usingstd::vector
. - Include default initial capacity, methods for stack operations, and dynamic resizing (e.g., double capacity when full).
- Handle iterator invalidation by throwing exceptions when using invalidated iterators.
- Develop a
- Discussion Points:
- Dynamic memory management and reallocation.
- Iterator invalidation on reallocation.
Part 3: Iterator Invalidation Exploration
- Objective: Observe iterator invalidation in
std::vector
. - Tasks:
- Write code to demonstrate iterator invalidation when
push()
causes reallocation. - Compare with
std::array
where iterators remain valid.
- Write code to demonstrate iterator invalidation when
- Discussion Points:
- Consequences of iterator invalidation in
std::vector
. - Safety of iterators in
std::array
.
- Consequences of iterator invalidation in
Part 4: Comparison and Reflection
- Objective: Compare both implementations.
- Tasks:
- Compare performance, memory usage, and use cases.
- Discuss trade-offs and appropriate scenarios for each container.
Assessment:
- Code Submission: Implement both stacks with specified functionality.
- Report: Include observations on iterator behavior and trade-offs.
Suggested Extensions:
- Performance Testing: Measure push/pop times for large data.
- Container Exploration: Compare with
std::deque
for alternative dynamic memory management.
Conclusion:
This assignment guides students through implementing and comparing stacks using std::array
and std::vector
, emphasizing size limits and iterator invalidation. It provides practical experience with C++ containers, enhancing understanding of their trade-offs and appropriate use cases.