How Can I Effectively Employ A Reflexive Bracketing Approach In My Phenomenological Study To Mitigate The Influence Of My Own Biases And Preconceptions As A Researcher, Particularly When Investigating Sensitive Topics Such As Teacher-student Power Dynamics, While Also Maintaining A Critical And Nuanced Understanding Of The Lived Experiences Of My Participants?

by ADMIN 363 views

To effectively employ a reflexive bracketing approach in your phenomenological study on teacher-student power dynamics, follow these organized steps:

  1. Self-Reflection and Bracketing:

    • Journaling: Begin by writing about your personal experiences and beliefs regarding teacher-student relationships. Ask specific questions to guide your reflections, such as your experiences with authority figures and any biases you may hold.
    • Bracketing: Store these reflections in a separate document to acknowledge without letting them influence your analysis. Regularly revisit and discuss them with peers or supervisors to ensure objectivity.

  2. Mindful Data Collection:

    • Interview Techniques: Use open-ended questions and active listening to allow participants to guide conversations. Practice neutral responses and non-verbal cues to avoid influencing their responses.
    • Awareness: Stay vigilant about your reactions during interviews. If triggered, note your feelings but remain neutral to ensure participants feel comfortable sharing.

  3. Rigorous Data Analysis:

    • Coding: Implement a coding system based on participants' words to identify themes and patterns. Ensure interpretations are grounded in their data by frequently referencing their statements.
    • Ongoing Reflexivity: Regularly reflect on potential biases during analysis, possibly through journaling or discussions, to maintain an unbiased perspective.

  4. Critical Nuance:

    • Balanced Analysis: Critically examine both overt and covert power dynamics, considering the social and institutional contexts. Focus on participants' perceptions and navigation of power structures rather than imposing your judgments.

  5. Transparent Documentation:

    • Reporting: Clearly document your reflexive process in the research report, detailing bracketing efforts, bias management, and challenges faced. Balance personal disclosure with professionalism to maintain credibility.

  6. Addressing Challenges:

    • Support Systems: Engage with mentors or peer groups to process emotional reactions and ensure they don't impact research. Recognize that fully setting aside biases is challenging and may require continuous effort.

By systematically applying these steps, you can mitigate biases and gain a nuanced understanding of participants' lived experiences, enhancing the credibility of your research.