How Can The CMIP5 Climate Models Accurately Predict The Global Temperature Response To CO2 Forcing When They Consistently Overestimate The Sensitivity Of The Atmosphere To Changes In The Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO), Particularly During The 1998-2013 Hiatus Period, And Fail To Replicate The Observed Phase-locking Of The IPO With The North Atlantic Oscillation?
Climate models like CMIP5 can still provide reliable global temperature predictions despite issues with regional climate patterns due to several key factors:
-
Dominance of CO2 Forcing: CO2-induced warming is a global phenomenon, whereas issues like overestimated IPO sensitivity and failure to replicate IPO-NAO phase-locking are regional. These regional inaccuracies may not significantly impact the models' ability to predict the overall global warming trend.
-
Ensemble Modeling: By averaging results from multiple models, ensemble modeling can mitigate individual model errors, leading to more accurate predictions despite regional discrepancies.
-
Model Improvements: Climate models are continually updated, with newer versions like CMIP6 addressing past issues, improving their performance over time.
-
Focus on Long-Term Trends: While models may struggle with decadal variability, they capture the essential multi-decadal trends driven by CO2, which are crucial for long-term predictions.
In conclusion, CMIP5 models remain effective for predicting global temperature responses to CO2 due to the dominance of global forcing, ensemble averaging, ongoing improvements, and focus on long-term trends.