How Can The Dialectical Tensions Between Foucauldian Power Relations And Bourdieusian Habitus Be Reconciled In A Qualitative Study Of Embodied Resistance Among Marginalized Groups, Particularly In Contexts Where The Researcher's Own Positionality And Privilege May Be Complicit In The Very Structures Of Oppression Being Critiqued?

by ADMIN 332 views

To reconcile Foucauldian power relations and Bourdieusian habitus in a qualitative study of embodied resistance among marginalized groups, while addressing the researcher's positionality and privilege, the following structured approach is proposed:

Theoretical Integration:

  1. Foucault and Power Relations: Analyze the diffuse and pervasive nature of power structures that marginalized groups resist. Power is exercised through discourses and institutions, targeting the body as a site of control and resistance.

  2. Bourdieu and Habitus: Examine how habitus, as internalized dispositions, shapes individuals' navigation of social structures. Habitus can be both a product of and a tool for resisting power, highlighting embodied practices as potential sites of resistance.

  3. Dialectical Relationship: Consider the interplay where power relations shape habitus, and habitus, in turn, informs resistance strategies. This interdependency shows how individuals use their embodied experiences to challenge external structures.

Methodological Approach:

  1. Qualitative Methods: Use interviews and ethnography to explore embodied resistance. These methods capture both discursive narratives and observed practices, providing rich data on how resistance is enacted through the body.

  2. Reflexive Practice: Acknowledge the researcher's positionality through reflexivity. Maintain a research journal and engage in peer debriefing to document and address personal biases and privilege.

  3. Participant Voice and Ethics: Employ narrative methods to amplify participants' voices. Ensure ethical considerations, including informed consent and non-exploitation, with potential community collaboration to contribute to social change.

Ethical Considerations:

  • Informed Consent and Benefit: Ensure participants are fully informed and that the research contributes positively to their community, possibly through social change initiatives.
  • Collaboration: Involve participants in the research process where possible, fostering a participatory approach that values their insights and agency.

Conclusion:

The study integrates Foucault and Bourdieu to show how power structures shape habitus, which in turn becomes a means of resistance. By using qualitative methods with reflexivity and ethical care, the research provides a nuanced understanding of embodied resistance, highlighting the complex interplay between external power and internalized dispositions. This approach ensures a comprehensive exploration of how marginalized groups navigate and challenge oppressive structures through their embodied practices.