How Does The Aristotelian Concept Of Telos Inform The Lockean Notion Of Natural Rights, Particularly In Regards To The Idea Of Self-ownership And The Implications This Has For A Libertarian Theory Of Justice That Seeks To Balance Individual Liberty With The Need For Social Coordination And Cooperation?

The Aristotelian concept of telos, referring to the natural purpose or end of something, particularly humans, informs John Locke's notion of natural rights by providing a philosophical foundation for their importance. Aristotle's telos, which for humans is eudaimonia or flourishing, suggests that certain rights are necessary for individuals to achieve their natural purpose. Locke's natural rights, including self-ownership, life, liberty, and property, can be seen as the means to fulfill this telos, enabling individuals to make choices, own property, and live without undue interference.

While Aristotle's focus was on the community's well-being, Locke's individualistic approach emphasizes inherent and universal rights. However, both perspectives can be reconciled by viewing natural rights as essential for individuals to pursue their telos, contributing to the common good. This alignment supports a libertarian theory of justice, which advocates for minimal government intervention, respecting individual rights, and promoting voluntary cooperation.

In this framework, justice involves protecting natural rights, allowing individuals to flourish, which indirectly benefits society. The role of government is limited to safeguarding these rights, enabling individuals to achieve their telos within a social context. Thus, the connection between telos and natural rights lies in their mutual goal of enabling human flourishing, with natural rights providing the necessary framework for individuals to pursue their purpose, thereby serving both individual and communal well-being.