ID Incorrectly Tries To Convert Old To New Parking Scheme

by ADMIN 58 views

Introduction

As an OpenStreetMap (OSM) contributor, I have been actively involved in mapping and editing the streets in my vicinity. Recently, I noticed a peculiar issue with the iD editor, where it incorrectly tries to convert the old parking scheme to the new one, leading to information loss and corrupt data. In this article, we will delve into the issue, provide examples, and suggest a possible solution.

The Issue

The issue arises when iD tries to convert the old parking scheme to the new one. The old parking scheme uses a combination of tags such as parking:lane and parking:lane:yes, while the new scheme uses a single tag parking:lane. However, iD's conversion process is incomplete, resulting in information loss and corrupt data.

Examples

To illustrate the issue, let's take a look at two examples:

  • Way 1039535438: This way has a parking lane with a capacity of 2 cars. However, after iD's conversion, the capacity is lost, and the way is marked as "no data".
  • Way 1053141214: This way has a parking lane with a capacity of 1 car and a restriction on parking during certain hours. However, after iD's conversion, the capacity and restriction are lost, and the way is marked as "no data".

Consequences

The incorrect conversion of the old parking scheme to the new one has several consequences:

  • Information loss: The capacity and restrictions on parking are lost, making it difficult for users to understand the parking rules.
  • Corrupt data: The incorrect conversion leads to corrupt data, which can cause issues with routing and other applications that rely on OSM data.
  • Confusion: The incorrect conversion can cause confusion among contributors, who may not understand why the data is incorrect.

Suggested Action

To resolve this issue, iD should not try to convert the old parking scheme to the new one. Alternatively, there needs to be much more sturdy rulesets in place to ensure that the conversion process is accurate and complete.

Benefits

By not converting the old parking scheme to the new one, we can:

  • Preserve information: The capacity and restrictions on parking are preserved, making it easier for users to understand the parking rules.
  • Maintain data integrity: The data remains accurate and complete, reducing the risk of corrupt data and issues with routing and other applications.
  • Simplify editing: Contributors can focus on editing the data without worrying about the conversion process.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the iD editor incorrectly tries to convert the old parking scheme to the new one, leading to information loss and corrupt data. To resolve this issue, iD should not try to convert the old parking scheme to the new one, or there needs to be much more sturdy rulesets in place. By preserving information and maintaining data integrity, we can simplify editing and ensure that OSM data remains accurate and complete.

Recommendations

To address this issue, we recommend the following:

  • Review the conversion process: Review the conversion process to that it is accurate and complete.
  • Implement sturdy rulesets: Implement sturdy rulesets to ensure that the conversion process is accurate and complete.
  • Preserve information: Preserve information by not converting the old parking scheme to the new one.

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed the issue of iD incorrectly trying to convert the old parking scheme to the new one, leading to information loss and corrupt data. In this article, we will provide a Q&A section to address some of the common questions and concerns related to this issue.

Q: What is the old parking scheme, and how is it different from the new scheme?

A: The old parking scheme uses a combination of tags such as parking:lane and parking:lane:yes, while the new scheme uses a single tag parking:lane. The old scheme provides more detailed information about parking, including capacity and restrictions.

Q: Why is iD trying to convert the old parking scheme to the new one?

A: iD is trying to convert the old parking scheme to the new one as part of its effort to simplify the parking tagging system. However, the conversion process is incomplete, resulting in information loss and corrupt data.

Q: What are the consequences of iD's incorrect conversion?

A: The incorrect conversion of the old parking scheme to the new one has several consequences, including:

  • Information loss: The capacity and restrictions on parking are lost, making it difficult for users to understand the parking rules.
  • Corrupt data: The incorrect conversion leads to corrupt data, which can cause issues with routing and other applications that rely on OSM data.
  • Confusion: The incorrect conversion can cause confusion among contributors, who may not understand why the data is incorrect.

Q: How can I avoid the issue of iD's incorrect conversion?

A: To avoid the issue of iD's incorrect conversion, you can:

  • Use the old parking scheme: Continue using the old parking scheme, which provides more detailed information about parking.
  • Avoid using iD's conversion tool: Avoid using iD's conversion tool, which can lead to incorrect conversions.
  • Manually edit the data: Manually edit the data to ensure that it is accurate and complete.

Q: What can I do if I have already been affected by iD's incorrect conversion?

A: If you have already been affected by iD's incorrect conversion, you can:

  • Review the data: Review the data to ensure that it is accurate and complete.
  • Correct the data: Correct the data to reflect the correct parking rules.
  • Contact the OSM community: Contact the OSM community for assistance in correcting the data.

Q: How can I contribute to resolving this issue?

A: You can contribute to resolving this issue by:

  • Reporting the issue: Report the issue to the OSM community, so that it can be addressed.
  • Providing feedback: Provide feedback on the conversion process, so that it can be improved.
  • Helping to correct the data: Help to correct the data, so that it is accurate and complete.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the issue of iD incorrectly trying to convert the old parking scheme to the new is a complex one, with several consequences. By understanding the issue and its consequences, we can take steps to avoid it and contribute to resolving it. We hope that this Q&A section has provided you with the information you need to address this issue.

Recommendations

To address this issue, we recommend the following:

  • Review the conversion process: Review the conversion process to ensure that it is accurate and complete.
  • Implement sturdy rulesets: Implement sturdy rulesets to ensure that the conversion process is accurate and complete.
  • Preserve information: Preserve information by not converting the old parking scheme to the new one.

By following these recommendations, we can ensure that OSM data remains accurate and complete, and that contributors can focus on editing the data without worrying about the conversion process.