[Test] Improve HTTP Server Test Coverage For /metrics And Count Endpoints
Introduction
Ensuring comprehensive test coverage is crucial for maintaining the reliability and stability of software applications. In the context of HTTP servers, testing core endpoints is essential, but it's equally important to cover key functionality such as Prometheus metrics and JSON count support. This article outlines the desired changes to improve test coverage for the /metrics
and count endpoints in the HTTP server.
Current Test Coverage
The current HTTP server tests in tests/unit/server.test.js
cover core endpoints such as /version
, /
, /list
, /json
, /health
, and 404 paths. However, these tests omit key functionality, including the Prometheus metrics endpoint and JSON count support for both simple and seeded scenarios. This lack of test coverage can lead to regressions and decreased confidence in core functionality.
Desired Changes
To address this issue, we need to update tests/unit/server.test.js
to include the following high-impact test cases:
1. GET /metrics
- Send a GET request to
/metrics
. - Expect a status code of 200.
- Expect the
Content-Type
header to matchtext/plain; version=0.0.4
. - Expect the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
header to be*
. - Verify that the response body includes metric lines for counters (e.g.,
'emoticon_requests_total'
,'emoticon_requests_root_total'
, etc.).
2. GET /json?count=
- With
count=3
, expect a status of 200 and anapplication/json
header. - Expect a JSON array of length 3, each item matching one of the built-in FACES.
- Verify that the CORS header
*
is present.
3. GET /json?count=&seed=
- With
count=3
andseed=1
, expect a JSON array length of 3 containingseededFace(1)
,seededFace(2)
, andseededFace(3)
. - Verify a status of 200, an
application/json
Content-Type, and a CORS header*
.
4. Error Handling for Invalid Count
- When
count
is non-numeric (e.g.,'abc'
) withAccept: application/json
, expect a 400 status and a JSON error object{ error: 'Invalid count: abc' }
. - When
count
is non-numeric without theAccept
header, expect a 400 status, atext/plain
Content-Type, and an error message'Invalid count: abc'
.
How to Apply
To apply these changes, modify tests/unit/server.test.js
in place:
- After existing tests, append the new test cases using the established
makeRequest
helper. - Use the existing FACES array and
seededFace
import to validate outputs.
How to Verify
To verify that the new HTTP server tests pass, run npm test
or npm run test
and ensure that all new tests pass, confirming coverage for the /metrics
and count endpoints.
Implementation
Here's an example implementation of the new test cases in tests/unit/server.test
:
describe('HTTP Server Tests', () => {
// ... existing tests ...
describe('/metrics endpoint', () => {
it('should return 200 status code', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/metrics');
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
});
it('should return text/plain; version=0.0.4 Content-Type header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/metrics');
expect(response.headers['content-type']).toBe('text/plain; version=0.0.4');
});
it('should return * Access-Control-Allow-Origin header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/metrics');
expect(response.headers['access-control-allow-origin']).toBe('*');
});
it('should return metric lines for counters', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/metrics');
const metricLines = response.body.split('\n');
expect(metricLines).toContain('emoticon_requests_total');
expect(metricLines).toContain('emoticon_requests_root_total');
});
});
describe('/json?count=<n> endpoint', () => {
it('should return 200 status code with count=3', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3');
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
});
it('should return application/json header with count=3', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3');
expect(response.headers['content-type']).toBe('application/json');
});
it('should return JSON array of length 3 with count=3', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3');
const jsonArray = JSON.parse(response.body);
expect(jsonArray.length).toBe(3);
});
it('should return CORS header * with count=3', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3');
expect(response.headers['access-control-allow-origin']).toBe('*');
});
});
describe('/json?count=<n>&seed=<s> endpoint', () => {
it('should return 200 status code with count=3 and seed=1', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3&seed=1');
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
});
it('should return application/json header with count=3 and seed=1', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3&seed=1');
expect(response.headers['content-type']).toBe('application/json');
});
it('should return JSON array of length 3 containing seededFace(1), seededFace(2), seededFace(3) with count=3 and seed=1', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=3&seed=1');
const jsonArray = JSON.parse(response.body);
expect(jsonArray.length).toBe(3);
expect(jsonArray).toContain(seededFace(1));
expect(jsonArray).toContain(seededFace(2));
expect(jsonArray).toContain(seededFace(3));
});
it('should return CORS header * with count=3 and seed=1', async () => {
const response = await make('/json?count=3&seed=1');
expect(response.headers['access-control-allow-origin']).toBe('*');
});
});
describe('Error handling for invalid count', () => {
it('should return 400 status with non-numeric count and application/json Accept header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=abc', { headers: { accept: 'application/json' } });
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
});
it('should return JSON error object with non-numeric count and application/json Accept header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=abc', { headers: { accept: 'application/json' } });
const errorObject = JSON.parse(response.body);
expect(errorObject.error).toBe('Invalid count: abc');
});
it('should return 400 status with non-numeric count without Accept header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=abc');
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
});
it('should return text/plain Content-Type header with non-numeric count without Accept header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=abc');
expect(response.headers['content-type']).toBe('text/plain');
});
it('should return error message with non-numeric count without Accept header', async () => {
const response = await makeRequest('/json?count=abc');
const errorMessage = response.body;
expect(errorMessage).toBe('Invalid count: abc');
});
});
});
Q: What is the purpose of improving test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: Ensuring comprehensive test coverage is crucial for maintaining the reliability and stability of software applications. In the context of HTTP servers, testing core endpoints is essential, but it's equally important to cover key functionality such as Prometheus metrics and JSON count support. This lack of test coverage can lead to regressions and decreased confidence in core functionality.
Q: What are the current test coverage limitations for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: The current HTTP server tests in tests/unit/server.test.js
cover core endpoints such as /version
, /
, /list
, /json
, /health
, and 404 paths. However, these tests omit key functionality, including the Prometheus metrics endpoint and JSON count support for both simple and seeded scenarios.
Q: What are the desired changes to improve test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: To address this issue, we need to update tests/unit/server.test.js
to include the following high-impact test cases:
- GET /metrics: Send a GET request to
/metrics
. Expect a status code of 200. Expect theContent-Type
header to matchtext/plain; version=0.0.4
. Expect theAccess-Control-Allow-Origin
header to be*
. Verify that the response body includes metric lines for counters (e.g.,'emoticon_requests_total'
,'emoticon_requests_root_total'
, etc.). - GET /json?count=
: With count=3
, expect a status of 200 and anapplication/json
header. Expect a JSON array of length 3, each item matching one of the built-in FACES. Verify that the CORS header*
is present. - GET /json?count=
&seed= : Withcount=3
andseed=1
, expect a JSON array length of 3 containingseededFace(1)
,seededFace(2)
, andseededFace(3)
. Verify a status of 200, anapplication/json
Content-Type, and a CORS header*
. - Error handling for invalid count: When
count
is non-numeric (e.g.,'abc'
) withAccept: application/json
, expect a 400 status and a JSON error object{ error: 'Invalid count: abc' }
. Whencount
is non-numeric without theAccept
header, expect a 400 status, atext/plain
Content-Type, and an error message'Invalid count: abc'
.
Q: How do I apply these changes to improve test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: To apply these changes, modify tests/unit/server.test.js
in place:
- After existing tests, append the new test cases using the established
makeRequest
helper. - Use the existing FACES array and
seededFace
import to validate outputs.
Q: How do I verify that the new HTTP server tests pass and improve test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------A: To verify that the new HTTP server tests pass, run npm test
or npm run test
and ensure that all new tests pass, confirming coverage for the /metrics
and count endpoints.
Q: What are the benefits of improving test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: By implementing these new test cases, we can ensure that the /metrics
and count endpoints are thoroughly tested, increasing confidence in core functionality and preventing regressions.
Q: What are the potential risks of not improving test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: The lack of test coverage for the /metrics
and count endpoints can lead to regressions and decreased confidence in core functionality, ultimately affecting the reliability and stability of the software application.
Q: How can I ensure that the new test cases are properly implemented and improve test coverage for the /metrics and count endpoints?
A: To ensure that the new test cases are properly implemented, follow these best practices:
- Use the established
makeRequest
helper to append new test cases. - Use the existing FACES array and
seededFace
import to validate outputs. - Verify that all new tests pass by running
npm test
ornpm run test
.
By following these best practices and implementing the new test cases, we can ensure that the /metrics
and count endpoints are thoroughly tested, increasing confidence in core functionality and preventing regressions.