What Is The Likelihood That The Rammed-earth Construction Techniques Employed In The Ming-era Xi'an City Walls Were Influenced By The Earlier Sui And Tang Dynasty Methods Of Using Pounded Gravel And Lime, As Evidenced By The Slightly Varying Ratios Of Aggregate To Binder Used In The Wall's Foundation Trenches Versus The Upper Courses?
The likelihood that Ming-era Xi'an city walls were influenced by Sui and Tang dynasty construction methods is very high. Here's a structured summary of the reasoning:
-
Historical Context and Continuity: The Sui and Tang dynasties predated the Ming and were known for their engineering prowess, including the use of pounded gravel and lime. This established a foundation of knowledge that subsequent dynasties, including the Ming, could draw upon.
-
Material Use and Techniques: Both periods used aggregate materials like gravel and binders such as lime, which are critical for durability. The Ming's use of these materials in rammed-earth construction aligns with the earlier practices, suggesting a possible lineage of technique.
-
Structural Engineering Insight: The variation in aggregate to binder ratios between foundation and upper courses indicates a sophisticated understanding of structural needs. This nuance likely resulted from accumulated knowledge over centuries, including insights from Sui and Tang constructions.
-
Documentation and Knowledge Transmission: Chinese architectural practices were well-documented, and craftsmen's skills were revered and passed down. This continuity makes it plausible that Ming engineers were informed by earlier methods.
-
Evolution of Techniques: The Ming's advanced engineering, as seen in the Xi'an walls, reflects an evolution of earlier techniques rather than independent development, pointing to a direct influence from Sui and Tang practices.
Conclusion: The Ming-era techniques were likely influenced by earlier Sui and Tang methods, as evidenced by material use, structural insights, and historical continuity.