What Were The Specific Mechanisms By Which Louis XIV Of France, As The Quintessential Exemplar Of Absolute Monarchy, Managed To Reconcile The Concept Of The Roi Soleil With The Traditional Gallican Liberties And The Notion Of The Monarch's Accountability To God, As Opposed To The More Radical Filmerian Notion Of Divine Right That Was Prevalent In 17th-century England?
Louis XIV successfully reconciled his role as the absolute monarch, or "Roi Soleil," with traditional Gallican liberties and the concept of divine accountability through a nuanced approach that balanced centralization with existing religious and political traditions. Here's how he achieved this:
-
Integration of Gallican Liberties: Louis XIV embraced Gallican liberties, which emphasized the French Church's independence from the Pope. He supported the Four Articles of 1682, asserting the church's autonomy while establishing the monarchy's supremacy in temporal matters. This allowed him to centralize power without outright rejecting traditional church freedoms.
-
Divine Accountability: Unlike the Filmerian divine right, which placed the monarch above earthly accountability, Louis XIV presented himself as God's lieutenant, accountable to God for maintaining order and justice. This narrative emphasized his divine mission while aligning his rule with the responsibility to uphold the nation's well-being.
-
Propaganda and Symbolism: He used art, public displays, and symbolic gestures to portray himself as divinely chosen. This reinforced his legitimacy and connected his rule to divine approval, making his authority seem both absolute and just.
-
Strengthening State Institutions: By centralizing administration through institutions like the intendants, Louis XIV enhanced state control. He framed this centralization as necessary for stability and prosperity, aligning it with his divine mission to lead France effectively.
-
Limited Representation: While not convening the Estates-General frequently, its occasional use symbolized a nod to traditional representation, acknowledging historical liberties without ceding actual power.
Overall, Louis XIV's approach was more nuanced than Filmer's radical divine right. He balanced absolute power with traditional structures, emphasizing divine approval and accountability, thus maintaining support while centralizing authority.